Benchmark results (was easy introduction to perl)

[Dave Hodgkinson]

On 7 Oct 2007, at 23:15, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:

> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>> I think Ash's point was that many perl people are moving away from  
>> plain
>> CGI.pm and are using more advanced tools like Mason, Catalyst, Jifty,
>> and CGI::Application.
> While looking at some benchmarking for Perl, PHP, ASP, etc, I came  
> across some results that mentioned Mason, and has certainly put me  
> off it!
> http://www.chamas.com/bench/

What's more expensive, computer time or programmer time?

>
> Not saying
> CGI.pm did any better, lol. Although I've only every used CGI.pm  
> for browser file uploads and not for generating HTML. I've always  
> used my own HTML routines, I was thinking about changing it all to  
> template toolkit, but looking at the memory overhead I think I  
> might stick with my own stuff...

*plonk*

What memory overhead?

-- 
Dave Hodgkinson
Back in the Market Risk swamp