Benchmark results (was easy introduction to perl)

[jesse]

On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:15:15PM +0100, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> >I think Ash's point was that many perl people are moving away from plain
> >CGI.pm and are using more advanced tools like Mason, Catalyst, Jifty,
> >and CGI::Application. 
> >  
> While looking at some benchmarking for Perl, PHP, ASP, etc, I came 
> across some results that mentioned Mason, and has certainly put me off it!
> http://www.chamas.com/bench/

It doesn't suggest that they knew enough about mason to turn off the
"development mode" features. But the test suite is definitely good for a
laugh.
> 
> Not saying
> CGI.pm did any better, lol. Although I've only every used CGI.pm for 
> browser file uploads and not for generating HTML. I've always used my 
> own HTML routines, I was thinking about changing it all to template 
> toolkit, but looking at the memory overhead I think I might stick with 
> my own stuff...
> 
> 
> Lyle
> 

--